# Writing a likelihood function

The attraction is that it might be more effective at finding global maxima and in "staying out of troublesome territory".

Multiplying thousands of probabilities together is simply not a viable approach without infinite precision. It gives this result: The smallness of the objective for large problems can become a major problem. Nelder-Mead is a derivative-free algorithm.

First, we want to define a function that specifies the probability of our entire data set. Here are the formulae for the OLS likelihood, and the notation that I use.

Log-likelihood[ edit ] For many applications, the natural logarithm of the likelihood function, called the log-likelihood, is more convenient to work with. Model comparison tables based on ICs are now common in the literature, so it is worthwhile to be able to produce your own using the basic likelihood approaches above.

Burnham and Anderson have additionally popularized a method established by Akaike that uses AIC values to calculate the relative weight of evidence supporting one model over others, given a list of reasonable alternative models fit to a given dataset.

It does not need you to write the gradient. You should be able to do this for all GLMs as well. SANN This is a stochastic search algorithm based on simulated annealing. In my toy experiment, this seems to be merely a question of speed - using the analytical gradient makes the MLE go faster. In such a situation, the likelihood function factors into a product of individual likelihood functions.

There could not be a simpler task for a maximisation routine. The logarithm of this product is a sum of individual logarithms, and the derivative of a sum of terms is often easier to compute than the derivative of a product.

One issue is that of restrictions upon parameters. When the search algorithm is running, it may stumble upon nonsensical values - such as a sigma below 0 - and you do need to think about this. The logarithm of such a function is a sum of products, again easier to differentiate than the original function.

In more complex situations, numerical derivatives are known to give more unstable searches, while analytical derivatives give more reliable answers. A simulation setup To use the other files on this page, you need to take my simulation setup file. As always in R, this can be done in several different ways.

I wrote a simple R program in order to learn about these. One traditional way to deal with this is to "transform the parameter space". It is the fastest The maximum likelihood approach says that we should select the parameter that makes the data most probable.

Conveniently, R has a built-in function logLik for returning log-likelihoods of a fitted model object: Here too there is a built-in function to save you the few seconds of trouble of writing the above formulas: Roll your own likelihood function with R This document assumes you know something about maximum likelihood estimation.

We assume that each observation in the data is independently writing a likelihood function identically distributed, so that the probability of the sequence is the product of the probabilities of each value. This variant uses the log transformation in order to ensure that sigma is positive.

This gives the result: This uses the ols. This yields the result: Finding the maximum of a function often involves taking the derivative of a function and solving for the parameter being maximized, and this is often easier when the function being maximized is a log-likelihood rather than the original likelihood function, because the probability of the conjunction of several independent variables is the product of probabilities of the variables and solving an additive equation is usually easier than a multiplicative one.

This suggests that the optimization approximation can work.I need to write a likelihood function to be optimized via fmincon. The problem here is that: 1) To simplify things, my likelihood function is dependent on \alpha, \beta where \beta is specified somewhere in the code before the fmincon part.

\alpha is the vector to be estimated via fmincon. 2) I plan. I am trying to write a likelihood function that jointly estimates a logit and a probit since in the model a sequential decision process is considered. In particular the story is about the participation on an insurance project and then the willingness to pay a prespecified bid for the contract (2 discrete choice decisions and dependent variables).

Algebraically, the likelihood L(θ ; x) is just the same as the distribution f(x; θ), but its meaning is quite different because it is regarded as a function of θ rather than a function of x.

Consequently, a graph of the likelihood usually looks very different from a graph of the probability distribution. Writing likelihood functions in R.

We'll write a likelihood function that includes a deterministic component which includes a nonlinear (exponential decay) relationship of magnolia abundance with distance-from-stream, with the rate dependent on elevation.

Writing the likelihood function You have to write an R function which computes out the likelihood function. As always in R, this can be done in several different ways.

I'm trying to estimate the parameters of my Log-Likelihood function given a set of constraints and using the Newton-Raphson method. My actual target function is more complex than the one that I w.

Writing a likelihood function
Rated 3/5 based on 30 review